DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
MARCH 14, 2007
MEMBERS
PRESENT: Dave Klug, John Cunningham, Scott Draughn,
Larry George, George McVey. Alan Seymour
arrived at 6:40. Ken Kraus was excused.
OTHERS
PRESENT: Chris Fleming, Todd Harkins,
Craig Eilers, Travis Evans, Ken Walters, Franco Manno, Jeff Baldanf, Tim Emery,
Steve Williams, Ron Young, Secretary Barb McCoy
The meeting was called to
order at 6:30 pm.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Voice vote was unanimous to approve the minutes of
February 28, 2007 as presented.
COMMENTS OF CITIZENS FOR NON
AGENDA ITEMS:
None
NEW BUSINESS:
Certificate
of Appropriateness Historic Uptown 2 signs in window for
Mrs.
McCoy read a letter from the applicant requesting this agenda item be tabled
until the April meeting due to the applicant being unable to attend.
Mr. Klug
made the motion to table this agenda item; the question put, stood:
Mr.
Cunningham Yes Mr.
Draughn Yes Mr. Klug Yes Mr. McVey Yes
Mr. George Yes
Certificate
of Appropriateness Historic Uptown demolition of house at
Mr. Cunningham stated a letter was received from Bob
Parrott of the historical society stating this house is of no historical
significance. Owner Ron Young stated the
fire destroyed the house completely inside. He will be making this property
into a parking lot. Mrs. McCoy stated if
the lot is used for display of autos for sale, mounding would not be required;
however if used for employee parking, shrubs or mounding would be required
along
Mr. Klug
made the motion to approve this agenda item; the question put, stood:
Mr.
Draughn Yes Mr.
Klug Yes Mr. McVey Yes Mr. George Yes Mr. Cunningham Yes
White
Castle Restaurant
Mrs. McCoy reviewed the memo from the City Planner
stating that based on the submitted lighting plan,
there is light spillover to over 50 onto the adjacent properties. May want to keep uniformity
in parking lot lighting in the City Gate subdivision. Bob Evans is planning on lights 28 in
height, bronze or black in color. Also
may want to use solid
gates for the trash enclosure. Bob Evans has agreed to no
freestanding sign on
Craig Eilers stated a
letter from the developer has been obtained.
They have presented a new architectural design for review. The monument sign has been moved to
The landscape plan was reviewed with it being noted
the plan has been compared to the tree plan approved for Bob Evans on the west
side to assure trees are spaced appropriately. They are using the retention pond as green
space. The grade for the retention pond
is mowable no steep slopes. Said majority of the
time it will be dry. Mr. Eilers stated it is approximately 3 to 1 slope.
Mr. Seymour stated in the past retention ponds have
been nuisances. Other projects are using
oversized pipes using parking lot underground. He stated it would be
unfortunate to have a row of detention ponds along
Mr. Eilers stated the
building has been moved forward 10 from business standpoint because there
will be no monument sign along Delaware Avenue, all the trees required possibly
may block the building and signs this building with the signs on the building
needs to be seen from Delaware Avenue.
Mr. Seymour stated the trees will not interfere.
Mr. Eilers stated they
will be relying on the building signs.
Building is very unlike other White Castles the tower features and
signs are important part of attracting customers. If push building back further, it may not be
able to be seen. Bob Evans has no drive
thru, which is how their building got back so far. Also, from operational standpoint, cars have
to be stacked through the drive thru. Perhaps can move additional 5 more.
Mr. McVey discussed the importance of aligning
perimeter trees appropriately. Should
have some way of delaying approval until you seen how adjacent properties are
developed. Consensus was it may be hard to do in case adjacent
property does not develop as quickly.
Discussion continued on the setback for the
building. Mr. Seymour suggested moving
back an additional 25 that would still make the building closer to
Mrs. McCoy reviewed the signs. Because there are two frontages, they are
permitted two ID and 4 business signs.
Will revised the calculations because of no monument sign on
Mr. Eilers presented
materials of stone and brick. He stated
they will also be using the Greenbriar manufactured
lighting like Bob Evans; they will be no taller than 28 and will be bronze or
black. Mrs. McCoy asked if there will be
spillover. Mr. Eilers
stated this business is open 24 hours a day and they need the wattage. He also stated they will use fiberglass gates
on the trash enclosure.
Mr. Cunningham made the motion to approve White
Castle Restaurant with the following conditions:
ุ Move building back to be located 75 from City right
of way with additional space to be green space along
ุ Move trees on east property line to other area of
property can be other variety of tree
ุ Signs to be approved by zoning inspector
ุ Lighting to be Greenbriar
manufacturer, 28 in height and bronze or black in color
ุ There will be no monument sign on
The
question put, stood:
Mr.
Seymour Yes Mr.
Klug Yes Mr. McVey Yes Mr. George Yes Mr. Cunningham Yes
Mr.
Draughn Yes
Plans to be resubmitted for final approval.
Boston Pizza Restaurant
Tim Emery stated he is part of the development group
and also will be the owner/operator of this project. It will be the first store in
Mr. Seymour stated there is sensitivity to
Discussion held concerning storm water. Steve Williams stated he had talked with Brian
Palmer earlier and stated there will be a dry basin in front of site that was
4 deep but will now be 3 deep slope will be 8 to 1 . It is usually dry and is very mowable.
Mr. Seymour stated he has a concern over the
location of the building being set back so far.
Mr. Williams responded that the lot is strangely shaped and this is the
only way they could configure the building and have sufficient parking. He questioned why all the parking is toward
Mr. Klug asked if there will be handicap buttons on
the doors. Mr. Williams stated if not,
they can be added.
Mr. Williams stated they have the lighting plans to
distribute tonight. They will be box
lights, 24 in height and bronze in color.
Mrs. McCoy reviewed the landscape plan. It was noted that 1,010 l.f.
is the perimeter area of the lot which requires 14 trees based on one for each
75. The plan shows 6 trees; 8 more
trees are required. Also, shrubs are not
required along the west property line; however, they are required to follow the
curve for
Mr. Klug requested the monument sign be moved to
Building material was discussed. Mr. Williams stated this is a prototype for
Boston Restaurant. No sides of the
building are unfinished. Back side is a
little less finished but still has a pleasing look. The building has a stone base, with stone on
top of that with three different colors of EIFS, bronze finish on windows,
corrugated metal panels that are spaced around perimeter of building. Consistency around
building. The red lines are red
boxed elements not lights.
Mr. Seymour stated there is a lot of metal on this
building. This building has more of a
casino look which is shocking. According
to ordinance 1144.10, there is to be a minimal use of metal. This building has a lot of metal. The intent of code is to assure materials and
colors are visually harmonious on the planned site and with surrounding
development. We know what is being
built next door and this is not harmonious.
Applicants stated
Mr. Cunningham stated from what he has seen on line,
this business has an upscale appearance to it.
It adds a lot of class to the area.
Honda, Lamborghini, the way the lights hits those buildings, lends a
very different and unique look to the area.
This building will have the same.
Mr. Emery stated this building makes a strong
statement.
Mr. Draughn stated this building pushes everything
Marysville as a city thinks it is. It
pushes envelopes because it is very different and is something we do NOT
have. This is northing short of a
cutting edge of art. We may even see
more different things in town because of this building. However, we do not like the Pizza on the
building. Applicants all agreed the
pizza is out. Mr. Draughn continued
stating this is a very lineal building, very rectangular, very cutting edge.
Mr. McVey noted the exterior reflects what is
inside.
Mr. Seymour stated he wants to make every assurance
this is right because it is so important because of the location.
Mr. George stated he feels it is clean, refreshing,
and very nice.
Mr. Alan iterated that he is uncomfortable with the
metal siding. Mr. Williams stated it is
a softer galvanized metal. Mr. Draughn
stated in the overall scheme of the building, it is the right material. Mr. Seymour stated there is a lot of
opportunity for bird problems. Mr.
Williams stated that may not be incorrect; however that is a maintenance
issue. The building has natural colors,
the stone blends well. Mr. Seymour
stated is he trying to assure this property has a visual interest consistent
with community identity, character and scale.
Discussion held concerning patio enclosure and down
lights on building. Dumpster enclosure
will be stone and EIFS.
Mrs. McCoy reviewed signs with the applicants
stating 6 signs are permitted on the building if they are not going to have a
freestanding sign. Signage permitted is
the width of building (82) times 2 164 sq. ft. plus 50% of that amount
because of the secondary frontage 82 sq. ft. additionally. The main ID sign can be width of building
times 1.2 =- 98 sq. ft. Second ID sign
can be 49 sq. ft. Two business signs can
be 33 sq. ft. and two business signs can be 16.5 sq. ft. Based on signage presented, the main ID sign
of 64 sq. ft is permitted; however second ID sign on
left
elevation can only be 49 sq. ft. After
discussion and measurement, on the left elevation the Salads Pasta
Ribs was measured at 32 sq. ft. Salads Ribs will be removed from the
right elevation and the Salads Pasta Ribs on front elevation each counted as
separate business signs would be permitted.
Official approval of signs to be approved by Mrs.
McCoy at later date.
Mr. Cunningham made the motion to approve Boston
Pizza Restaurant with the following conditions:
ุ Push buttons for entrance doors will be installed
per
ุ Lights will be 24 bronze down-lit poles
ุ 8 trees to be added per perimeter trees requirement
ุ The shrubs along east property line should go with
curvature of
ุ 2 Hackberry trees required along
ุ Pizza slice to be removed from sign
ุ Dumpster will be moved to corner of parking lot and
buffered by perimeter trees
ุ Sign permit to be issued by zoning inspector no
monument sign, 2 wall ID signs and 4 business signs permitted
The
question put, stood:
Mr. Klug
Yes Mr. McVey Yes Mr. George Yes Mr. Cunningham Yes Mr. Draughn Yes Mr. Seymour No
Plans to be resubmitted for final approval.
Review of
This agenda item was tabled until next months
meeting due to the City Planner being out of town.
COMMENTS OF INDIVIDUAL BOARD
MEMBERS:
Discussion held on requiring
approval of Phil Connolly on any lot in the City Gate Subdivision before the
Design Review Board reviews the request that was approved at last months
meeting. Mr. Cunningham stated he was not
present at that meeting but feels theres nothing in the chapter that requires
compliance with deed restrictions.
Developers can have their own; that is their
business. That is not the Citys
business. We can tell them that Mr.
Connolly has requirements and if changes are made they would have to come back
to us. Mrs. McCoy stated that is done
now. Mr. Seymour stated he thinks Mr.
Kraus thought we needed to do this; however there is no law that requires us to
do this. Mr. Draughn stated he wanted to
go on record that he feels it is in conflict with the ordinance.
Mr. McVey stated on future
landscape plans he would like to see quantities given. Mr. McCoy stated she would require in future.
Mrs. McCoy stated she forgot
to discuss the exit drive for
ADJOURNMENT: The
meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.