PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
MEETING
APRIL 27,
2006
The meeting was called to
order by Mr. Marshall at 6:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: John Marshall, Leah Sellers, Mark
Reams
OTHERS PRESENT: Kathy House, Floyd Golden, Johnie Myers, Gary Johnson, Phil Roush
AGENDA:
·
Organization
Mr. Reams nominated Mr.
Marshall as Chairman, seconded by Ms. Sellers. Mr. Marshall elected
Chairman.
·
Code
Red
Ms. House said the City has
been in discussion with the County about the possibility of a city/county
partnership in acquiring ___________ product. Feels it would be very beneficial in a
variety of capacities. The quote
received for the cost of the product is $14,000 for the County. We are hoping to partner with the
County. She asked if Public Safety
Committee would want the City to pursue this for budgeting purposes.
The Code Red system is a
system where an alert can be put out via phone where a computer generated
message is called out to whatever area designated to say there is a tornado
warning, chemical spill, etc, to say this is what you should do. It is in effect in other areas and
apparently received high endorsements in those areas. One of the advantages to getting on
board early is that the price quoted never goes up. Another advantage is that you can
designate the area to be contacted, without having to contact the entire
database. Under the City’s
authority, City has direct access to the program, etc.
Mr. Marshall asked if
protocol would be set up as to when to use it? Ms. House said there are standards set
up for what type of situations are appropriate and what
personnel would be authorized to use it.
It also has the capability to filter out whether or not it has received
an answering machine or no answer and recalls if it receives an answering
machine or no one answers after a certain number of times. Administration feels it’s a very useful
product. The cost sharing would
probably be 50/50. The $14,000
would be for software and you would get minutes for that amount. If you need additional minutes you can
purchase more for $2,000 per $10,000 minutes. This is renewable annually. The most likely uses for the City of
Chief Johnson stated that
the sirens are audible warning signs.
The range can be significantly affected by rain, winds, traffic and
buildings.
Purpose of putting this on
the agenda is to make the Committee aware of such a product and to hear how
strongly the Administration feels about it.
Ms. Sellers asked if there
was any chance of getting Homeland Security Funds for this. Chief Johnson said they are really
tightening up on a lot of things.
He did not think Homeland Security funds would pay for something like
this.
Consensus of committee is
that it’s a good idea.
Ms. Sellers reminded
Administration to look at all opportunities for grants.
·
NEW FIRE
CODE
Chief Johnson explained
that the City was previously under the Building Administrators and Code
Officials Fire Code, which is mirrored in the City ordinances. It has been changed from BOCA to the
International Fire Code. We’re now
in concert with the Building Department who is also under the International
Building Code. We now have
companion codes in the City for both the Building Department as well as the Fire
Code. City ordinances reflect the
BOCA Code and need to be changed to the International Fire Code. Before the Ohio Fire
Code was referred to as the Ohio Fire Prevention Code. These proposed changes to the ordinances
are changes relative to the code designation itself.
A couple of other changes
were recommended to Chapter 127 which basically states “a fire
investigator”. City now has three
fire investigators which are Board Certified, so changes to the language are
necessary to change from singular to plural.
Also request a change in
Chapter 110, City Fees, to the
·
NEW FIRE STATION OPTION
& POST-VACATION OPTIONS FOR CURRENT STATION
Past discussions have
indicated that the current fire station does not provide easy access to the
entire city. However, the City
cannot afford to staff a second fire station. The City is suggesting consideration be
given to a spot in cooperative effort with the State of
Mr. Reams stated in
previous discussions, it was agreed there were different options and to evaluate
all options, and not just settle on a site because it’s the cheapest. Must ask what’s the
best option long term.
He would like to see some evaluation of different locations. He expressed concern that we’re a
growing community and at some point, we do need a second station, whether it’s
now or five or ten years down the road. We know there is growth pressure on the
Rt. 33 Corridor area, which is an area we serve through contracts with other
townships. He would like to explore the idea of a fire district to serve those
areas. Given that, where would be
the best location for a system with two stations, and that if we relocate the
existing station, it should go to one of those two locations that would serve
our future. Would like us to pursue
the idea of a more regional approach to fire protection looking at a fire
district and how then that plays into a two-station operation and the location
for the first of two stations.
The main reason for the
proposed location instead of in the
Mr. Marshall questioned why
the City is still in the fire business with all the outlying departments that we
have mutual aid with, why are we not pursuing a fire
district, self-supportive, elected financing. Ms. House stated that has been
investigated, but in the last couple of years, the City has had too many other
more pressing issues to deal with and have not had any time to deal with this
issue. It was brought up with some
of the township trustees when fire contracts were discussed with us, but it
hasn’t gone any further than that.
Chief Johnson noted the
majority of the runs are in the City.
Many times there are multiple runs at the same time where townships have
to come in to help out. Mr.
Marshall pointed out that in the future when development occurs between here and
Rt. 42, “in the city” could potentially be a run to Rt. 42. We need a quick fix now, but also a long
term plan. He just hates to see the
City spend the money on a fire station in the proposed location now, when in the
future, we may go to a fire district and that station would not be needed
because of positioning.
Chief Johnson met with John
Green to get a feel for the cost of staffing a second station. You are looking at an average of
$300,000 for the first two years.
He has all kinds of data regarding staffing. Ms. House stated we have to take a first
step then go on from there. Ms.
Sellers asked what she perceived to be the first step. Response was relocating the fire
station. Mr. Reams disagreed. He feels the first step is developing a
plan for the future on how and when we’ll get to a two-station operation then
decide where to locate those stations.
Consensus of the Committee
is to begin meeting monthly on this issue to continue discussion/planning. Ms. Sellers perceives an immediate need
and appreciates all the work done so far on the proposed location, but would
like more information and would like to move on this as quickly as
possible. Committee will meet the
second Thursday of the month at 6:00 p.m. just prior to City Council
meeting. Next meeting is May 25,
2006 at the Fire Station. Ms.
Sellers asked Committee to think about forming a citizen committee for this
issue.
·
CITIZEN POLICE ACADEMY
PROPOSAL
Chief Golden stated the
purpose of this program is public education, public relations, contacts in the
Police Department if you have a problem.
Let people know what programs exist within the Police Department. Program will begin in the fall and will
be held one night a week for a couple of hours. This program will create awareness. Program will be publicized in the
newspaper and cable station and website.
Committee thought it was a good idea.
·
SMOKING
BAN
Mr. Marshall stated back in
November, 2005, Council received a group of letters from Mrs. Cunningham’s
2nd grade class asking for a smoking ban in restaurants in
Marysville. He asked if the
Committee wanted to take any action and if so, what action should be
taken.
Mr. Reams commented that he
was surprised the community hasn’t done something about this before now. Ms. Sellers said this should be a
community-oriented issue that the residents should come together and put it on
the ballot. Mr. Reams said he
would welcome that issue on the ballot.
Mr. Marshall will draft a
letter to the class, telling them it had been discussed by the Committee and the
feeling of the committee would be that it should be a public initiative to bring
this forward and not a council initiative.
·
This issue has been discussed at Public Services Committee.
Meeting adjourned at 6:53
p.m.