PARKS &
RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 13, 2006
The
meeting was called to order by Vice Chairperson Dwertman
at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS
PRESENT: John Howard, Cathy Dwertman, Deborah Groat, Mary
Catherine Rodenberger, Rowland Seymour Excused: Russ Jones, John Marshall
OTHERS
PRESENT: City Engineer Roush, Supt. of
Parks & Rec Steve Conley, Clerk Patterson, Carmen
Seymour, Pearl Drumm, Alan Seymour, John Kleinman, Cheryl Welty, Merrill Rausch, Evelyn & Don
Graham, E. Martha Kramer, Leon Kramer, Dan Fogt, Betty Fogt, Jim Page, John and
Catherine Cugeber, Pearl Blumenschein,
Michael Robinson
APPROVAL
OF MINUTES: There being no additions or
corrections, the minutes were approved as distributed.
REPORT
OF DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION: No
report.
REPORT
OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS & RECREATION:
Mr. Conley reported that the first Concert in the Park was held on
Sunday with approximately 100 people in attendance.
The
pool opened on Memorial Day weekend.
Attendance has been down due to the cool weather.
The
Playground Program has begun at
The
next concert is June 25th.
Trombones Plus will be playing.
COMMISSIONER’S
REPORT ON INDIVIDUAL PARKS: All of the
parks look great. Mr. Conley stated in
regards to the picnic tables at
Mr.
Seymour said
CITIZENS’
COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS:
OLD
BUSINESS:
Ms.
Dwertman asked that if the Commission had no
objection she would like to move “Comments of Citizens – Agenda Items” up to
when discussion of that topic takes place instead of after New Business. No objections.
Mr.
Roush addressed this issue. He
distributed a report from John Shady, Environmental Scientist from Malcolm
Pirnie, the firm who did an independent review of
1)
Hydrophytic Vegetation – Prevalent vegetation consists
of plants that are adapted to areas having hydrologic and saturated soil
conditions.
2)
Hydrology – Area is inundated either permanently or periodically at mean
water depths < 6.6 feet, or soil is saturated at the surface at some
time during the growing season of the prevalent vegetation, and
3)
Hydric Soils – Soils have been classified as hydric, or possess characteristics associated with reducing
soil conditions.
Mr.
Roush said Mr. Shady shared some information about the question that was asked.
We understand this area had been farmed at one time with crops on it and he
said that the agriculture is somewhat exempt from wetland requirement, and that
once a property stops being agricultural and farmed, if the soils (inaudible)
to the present can revert to a wetland. Investigation done on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ website support
that position. The information on
the website indicates that once a property is farmed and then is no longer
farmed, wetlands can be determined within six months after being farmed.
Mr.
Roush distributed a Fact Sheet from Ohio EPA as an introduction to House Bill
231 talking about Isolated Wetlands in
Mr.
Roush noted an article in the Journal Tribune done by Ryan Horns. He tried to do a nice article, but
unfortunately it would appear from the article that the research he did and the
study he references in the article was done specifically for the Adena Pointe development and not
Mr.
Conley asked Mr. Roush if we were to get a 404 or 401 permit,
could we put in a retention pond w/aeration and could we also put in the
walking trails. The Corps of Engineers
is the only one who can answer that. Mr.
Roush thought we could do something, but it’s just a question of how much. Mr. Seymour stated in his conversation with
the Army Corps of Engineers, they stated regardless of whether it’s a man-made
wetland or a natural wetland, you could apply for a permit and there would be
no reason for the permit to be denied.
Mr. Roush stated there are limits on permits, such as in some cases a
permit for a wetland means you have to mitigate the wetland, meaning you have
to replace it with a different wetland at some other point at 1-1/2 times the
area of the wetland you are disturbing, which could be very expensive. Mr. Seymour noted that Adena
Pointe applied for a permit on their wetland and received it to put in a retention
pond and set aside .400 of an acre to replace the wetland. Mr. Roush said you can disturb a wetland up
to a half acre under a nationwide permit.
If you go over a half acre, you have to do some mitigation.
Mr.
Page stated there is water coming across from the golf course. He thought Mr. Drumm
put in the tile that goes up there to drain it.
Mr. Drumm said there was one there and he
added an additional tile. The City put
in a catch basin. Mr. Page said that
tile is a lot smaller than the one going across the road from the golf course
so probably no matter what you do, you’re going to have some water to hold
somewhere for a while. You are going to
have more water coming across the road than you’re going to be able to get rid
of right away. Mr. Roush confirmed that we’re wanting to put a pond in there and the City wants the Adena Pointe developers to provide a better outlet. He understands that the tile that was put
through
Mr.
Page said the City could go ahead and apply for the Army permit and pay for
what you think you’re going to do and the Army won’t know the difference. It will take six months.
Mr.
Conley said he hopes she (meaning lady at Army Corps of Engineers) gets it
right because in the article that she referred to, she said that the City
should have known already that
Mr.
Page said there is a soil wetland expert that lives on Rt. 38 and goes by this
area every day. He said it would cost $200 for him to stop by on his way home
to say whether or not it’s a wetland.
Unidentified
person said Pewamo soil determines if it’s a
wetland. He said where the city is
putting their sanitation plant is pewamo soil. He owns 100 acres right around that area and
farmed it for years. The new plant is
being built in wetlands. It could be
determined wetland if it was done within a certain period when it discontinued
agriculture. It was farmed up until 1977
until they added all that acreage across Rt. 38.
Mr.
Rowland Seymour said that if you have a drain tile going to property to drain
rain water and that tile breaks down and is left down and the water doesn’t get
out, it will eventually become a wetland.
Mr. Roush said it depends on the soil type. Mr. Seymour said it will eventually become a
wetland because if the water can’t leave; it’ll become flooded and the soils
will produce a wetland. Mr. Roush stated
there is a difference between flooded land and wetlands.
Mr.
Seymour says the work that Adena Pointe plans to do
will not do any good unless the City repairs the tile in
The
City is being cautious about going in and doing anything to this land if it’s a
wetland because the Army Corps of Engineers can come in and fine the City.
Mr.
Seymour asked why the City chose Malcolm Pirnie to make this decision, why not
the Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. Roush
stated the Army wants the City to collect the data, then
they will review it. Malcolm Pirnie,
specifically John Shady, did all the environmental reports for the water
reclamation facility and the City was impressed with his character and
credentials.
Unidentified
person said developer A came in a while ago and said
it was not a wetland and now developer B is coming in and says it is a
wetland. He feels whatever the
developers want to have happen to that park, is what will happen and that’s
wrong.
Mr.
Conley’s take on this is that they had a meeting to discuss the pond that
Beazer Homes wants to put in, one of the gentlemen said his people had looked
at it and they were reluctant to do anything because they feel it might be a
wetland. That’s where things changed.
That’s the first time any development has mentioned to him that it’s a wetland.
Unidentified
person said he moved into the area in 1993 and asked if anyone would build back
there and was told “no, we did soil samples, there’s no way” so the developers
knew it. “We need some accountability
longer than service.” He envisions this
new subdivision coming in to the corner and say they’ve met their obligations,
we’re done. He said there is no water in
that corner. He doesn’t know what
they’re draining.
Mr.
R. Seymour doesn’t understand why they want to put a detention pond in their
wetland and not in
Unidentified
person stated Pearl Drumm showed him exactly how to
drain the whole thing. Adena Pointe is going to put a pond right through the tile
that now drains
At
the last Parks & Rec meeting, the Board discussed
drafting a resolution to take to City Council.
In Mr. Marshall’s absence, Ms. Dwertman read a
portion of the minutes from the last Council meeting where Mr. Marshall spoke
on this issue.
“Mr. Marshall reported that Parks
& Recreation Commission will meet one week earlier this month, June 13th. At the last meeting,
There will be more
discussion at the next Parks & Rec meeting on
June 13th.
Regarding drafting a
resolution to bring to City Council, since zoning has been set, Mr. Marshall is
not sure City Council would be the best place to address this. He asked Mr. Seymour to be in contact with
Planning Commission as they may be much closer to the situation and have more
control over how the resolution would take place.
Mr. John Cunningham stated
discussions on drainage issues were held at a recent Planning Commission
meeting, and in particular, this area is a significant concern. He spoke with Phil Roush and Phil is willing
to work with Planning Commission on the drainage issues. Mr. Cunningham would like to host a joint
session between Planning Commission and City Council to have this type of
discussion. They feel this would be an
education and awareness session and hopefully would give some direction in
planning so they could better utilize and make judgments in the future.”
Mr.
Fogt addressed the Commission. He referred to a document from John Rockenbaugh. What
bothers him is if this area is declared a wetland and if we try to create a
wetland, it’s got a list of the animals, predators and mosquito predators that
thrive in healthy wetlands and they include many things, but what bothers him most
are the frogs and the non-venomous snakes, etc.
People in the area have already had problems with snakes. The land gets wet which draws those types of
animals in there, then when the land dries out, those animals find someplace
else to live and that’s the neighboring houses.
These mosquito predators come in and control the mosquitoes but when it
dries out, these animals are looking for a place to live. He is not looking forward to this. He does not want it to become a wetland.
Mr.
Leon Kramer stated the back of his house faces the park. He stated the City installed two or three
drops in that tile. One is at the
intersection at the woods at Adena Pointe and that
one is blown out completely. He said
it’s because it’s blocked below there and the water backs up and forces it out
and now it’s all blown out. The problem
is from the woods on down. If this tile
were to function properly, this would not develop here. Mr. Roush said when Adena
Pointe develops, that’ll be fixed.
Mr.
Jim Page said he and his partner studied this area some time ago and had a plan
that was dated 1984. In 1984, the plan
was to take that water over to Greenwood Colony. There is a note on the plan that says “tile
broken down from logging operation in the woods.” He feels what the residents are saying is
probably right, that the tile is broken downstream and Adena
Pointe is probably doing the right thing.
They have the plans and their engineers have looked at them. It looks like two things can be done. #1. You don’t have
to go down in that hole to check that tile; you can go up on the hill out of
the wetlands and trench down. City
should not be afraid to go up there east of that hole and dig down to the tile
and then go down there 2,000 ft. or so to Adena Pointe. There are several hundred feet of tile down
to Adena Pointe.
You could go ahead and open up the tile on the hill and open it down
near the woods somewhere and at least go and check that section of tile ahead
of time. You would not be disturbing the
wetlands. He suggested going ahead and
applying for the 404 permit right now based on Adena’s
plans and supposing what they’re doing is right and if what they do is done, then you could go ahead and prepare the plan for the rest of
the area clear over to Rt. 38. The 404
permit doesn’t cost a lot of money just to get it into the Army Corps of
Engineers to check. It may cost $5,000
to get the plans into the Army Corp, once you have the field work on
paper. It only gets expensive when you
have to remove the wetlands.
Mr.
Fogt asked, “What if you apply for that 404 and then Adena Pointe fixes the tile and the drainage works like
it’s supposed to and then there is no more water problem up there, have we
created a problem by getting the Army Corp involved?” Mr. Page said if you have a
wetlands there, which he feels it probably is, and big as the area is,
it will take a 404 permit and with all this pressure from the public, he feels
the City would have a very strong case of getting that either moved or
altered.
Mr.
Roush stated from what he’s hearing from the people, they don’t want the area
to be determined to be a wetland. Mr.
Page said, “You can’t just hide from it; if it’s a wetland, it’s a
wetland. Wetlands can be developed on a
construction site.” If the three
criteria for a wetland are present, you have a wetland.
Ms.
Groat asked if the City could maintain the tile
without getting cited by the Army Corps of Engineers? Mr. Page said he feels the City has the right
to maintain the tile, but before they go down there and start digging up tile,
he’d go outside the wetlands and make sure.
Mr. Roush agreed that the City has the right to maintain the tile. Ms. Groat stated we
need more patience to see what Adena Pointe does and
then take the City’s right to maintain their own
property and at that point, determine the future of that whole area. She feels it is a good suggestion to apply
for whatever permits are necessary.
Mr.
Seymour stated the City has an obligation to repair the tile.
Mike
Robinson’s property borders the park. He
noted prior to the City bulldozing that, the previous owner was ordered by the
City to bring in a backhoe and dig a ditch for the tile. He said it is what it is and it’s always been
that. If we’re worried about what the Army
Corps of Engineers are going to think; we’ve already done that as a City. He noted it was stated earlier that predators
will control mosquitoes; that is wrong.
When that was a wetlands behind his house,
beginning in June, you could not walk in his backyard after 4:00 p.m because of the mosquitoes. You must have a plan to control mosquitoes if
you’re going to have a wetland.
Mr.
Conley stated if this is determined to be a wetland, he does not think a pond
will be built. If it is a wetland, we’ll
let the native grasses grow and put trails where we can.
Unidentified
resident said she would be perfectly happy if the City continues to mow the
grass and the tile is repaired.
Mr.
Conley confirmed if the City could go in and repair the tile,
that is the high land tile above the lower swales, cut the grass and everyone
would be happy. Response from residents
was, “Yes.”
Mr.
Seymour asked what assurance do they have as residents
there that the Adena Pointe development will not back
water up into
Mr.
Conley stated it’s probably always going to be technically a wetland because
the Pewamo soils are going to be there. The water will stay there when a big rain
comes and the vegetation is there, so to say that if we fix the tile it’s no
longer a wetland is not true.
Mr.
Pearl Blumenschein addressed the Commission. He stated Pearl Drumm
showed him this water goes down behind
Mr.
Pearl Drumm said, “You think you’ve got a problem
now, but you check the development going on out there on
Ms.
Dwertman stated she didn’t think there was anybody on
this board that’s unsympathetic. She’s
not sure that the board is just not citizens along with the rest in this
case. She does not know that they have
any more right to change this than the residents. The Board can advise City Council, etc, but
feels we need to be patient and maybe get those drain tiles fixed.
Unidentfied person said in talking about the drain tiles, there is water that lays
there and eventually drains away. Will
there be a continuation of people digging a trench coming down into that basin
and relieving the water from some other place.
She has been there four years and it’s been done twice. They brought it out from 38 somewhere and
brought it down to the biggest pond. Mr.
Conley believes that since there is an opinion that this area is a wetland, he
didn’t feel it would happen any more.
PARK PROJECT PLAN
Mr.
Conley noted in 2008 for the City Pool, plan showed to build a storage area off
the concession area. That was done this
year with money donated to Parks & Rec by
YEAR
2007
City Pool – Carpenter ants have been
discovered in the roof of the City Pool, so the roofing needs repairs. He is proposing replacing the wood that lies
underneath the shingles. Cost is
$35,000.
Mill Valley Park South – Put in a
restroom/shelter. Due
to the fact that water and sewer need to be run, increase price to $150,000
from $115,000. Total for 2007 is
$185,000.
YEAR
2008
MacIvor
Woods – Put in a gravel drive and parking lot back to the area at the cost of
$30,000. Had originally scheduled this and
paving for 2010. Mr. Conley suggested
breaking up this project by putting the gravel drive and parking lot in 2008
then pave it in 2010.
YEAR
2009
Aldersgate –
Put in concrete sidewalks. The $21,000
cost is about three years old, so Mr. Conley suggested increasing it to $24,000. He noted we need to keep the figure under
$26,000 because that’s the magic number for prevailing wage now. That number changes from time to time. By keeping it under the prevailing wage
number, it will save the City 1/3 of the cost.
YEAR
2010
MacIvor
Woods – Delete excavation and leave pave drive and parking lot w/shelter. Nothing can be put inside the preserve. He envisions a small shelter at the entrance
with a couple of picnic tables, garbage can and a sign telling about the
preserve.
YEAR
2011
Aldersgate –
Restroom facilities, estimated cost $86,000.
City crew would be doing water and sewer work.
Mr.
Seymour questioned the allocation of $150,000 for
It
was agreed that the $75,000 in the 2006 budget for
Mr.
Robinson stated a number of years ago, it was promised to put in a double row
of trees as a buffer between the homes and
Unidentified
resident asked with the number of houses going in Adena
Pointe, shouldn’t they have their own park.
Mr. Roush stated that when subdivisions go through Planning Commission
for platting, there is a determination made whether they’ll provide parkland or
money in lieu of parkland. The City’s
position for the last several years is to take the money, $1,000 per lot,
because we don’t need the parkland.
Mr.
Conley stated one thing we need to look at as a group is park usage and compare
Mr.
Seymour asked when the shelter house would be replaced at
Mr.
Howard moved to approve the 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Plan as presented,
seconded by Ms. Groat; affirmative voice vote was
unanimous.
NEW
BUSINESS:
Mr.
Conley announced the Day in the Park would be held on July 8th at
COMMENTS
OF INDIVIDUAL COMMISSIONERS:
Ms.
Groat thanked Mr. Roush for attending and offering
his expertise. Mr. Howard said the
entire Commission thanks Mr. Roush. He
stated, “It’s not really an us versus them situation
as it seems once in a while, because everybody is wanting the same thing here I
think. It’s just that our hands are
tied. Just wait and see what happens.”
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before
Parks & Recreation Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.