Public Service Committee Minutes
September 17, 2007
The meeting was called to
order by Chairman Gore at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: John Gore, Dan Fogt,
Mark Reams
OTHERS PRESENT: Kathy House, Tracie Davies, Phil Roush, Brian
Palmer
AGENDA:
1)
Traffic Study
The Traffic Study was
presented at the last Public Service Committee Meeting. The Committee was asked to review it, then discuss it at this meeting. The members were asked for any input received
or what direction should be taken. As
discussed at the last meeting, it would be best to do everything in order to
get the full picture. Cost to do
everything proposed in the study is $152,526.
That money is not budgeted and would have to be appropriated.
Mr. Fogt
noted Item #13, Conversion to One-way, 4th & 5th
Streets. He doesn’t see any way that
Mr. Gore feels it’s necessary
to do the whole study, and not just parts of it. There is a critical need to get the traffic
through town.
Messers. Gore and Reams agreed to
sponsor the legislation for the appropriation for the entire traffic
study. Mr. Fogt
is hesitant about doing the entire study due a change in the administration
next year. He would not want to have to
do it all over again once the City has a new Mayor. Response was it wouldn’t have to be done over
again. The study will not be done by the
first of the year. If Mr. Fogt decides to sponsor the legislation, he will contact
Connie Patterson.
Mr. Fogt
questioned Rt. 4 & Milford Avenue.
Did the school do a traffic study. Mr. Roush said if he had to leave anything
out of the Traffic Study, it would be that part. The school was told to add a left turn lane
on
Mr. Roush feels the entire
study should be done.
2) Bokes/Mill Creek Watershed Funding
Ms. Davies said the City has
been contributing towards the cost of the salary for the Watershed Coordinator
for Bokes/Mill Creek. City pays 1/3 of the cost along with the
County and Scotts Company. City fronts
the money for the Scotts Company, and they reimburse the City so it’s eligible
for state matching dollars. Original
commitment to the Soil & Conservation District was for three years, through
2008. Ms. Davies met with Gary Lee and
Chris Schmenk, representing Scotts, to discuss
another three years, through 2011. She
asked what the Committee thought.
Mr. Reams asked how much of
the watershed was in the City limits.
Ms. Davies was unsure how many miles, but noted that the majority of the
watersheds that have been identified as being problematic are in the City
limits. City’s share is roughly
$9,000. Committee agreed to support the
contribution for the next three years.
3)
Possible code
changes governing unpaid utility fees.
Ms. House distributed a memo
from Mr. Morehart.
This has been an ongoing problem for quite some time with
tenant/landlord utility billings. The
most recent example of that is one of the landlords had their property taxes
certified for $675 for a water bill that a tenant racked up over the summer
months. There is always a dispute about
whose responsibility that should be. The
City Code authorizes the Finance Department to certify any unpaid utility
bills, once a year in August, to property taxes. An example of how
4)
2007 Goals
·
Continue working
on the traffic study – already discussed.
·
Continue working
on the Town Run.
Mr. Gore noted that Mr. Eric
Phillips mentioned at the last City Council meeting that a committee had been
formed to address issues with the Town Run.
John Gore and John Marshall are on this committee, along with several
others. The intent needs to be
addressed and hopefully something can be done with it. From the City’s perspective, next year’s
budget will include some money for application and engineering work. There may be some grant money out there for
work of this type. Feels it would be
best served to hire a consultant to coordinate the applications and design.
Mr. Fogt
asked about the replacement of the culvert on
·
Sidewalk
maintenance discussion. Mr. Reams asked
how the program was going. Ms. House
said three applications were received and all have been approved. She said feedback indicates that quite a few
business owners would like to take advantage of the program, but it was set up
for residential properties only. She
feels it would be good to open it up to business owners if residents aren’t
going to take advantage of it.
Mr.
Reams stated the goal is to get sidewalks in.
We need to get those sidewalks in.
This is an incentive, but eventually it could become a mandate.
Do
we need to expand the area and open it up to business owners? There is no money proposed in the budget for
that. $10,000 was originally put in the
budget for this program. Mr. Reams would
like to see the area expanded, as well as open it up to businesses.
Committee agreed to keep $10,000 in the budget for
next year.
·
Stormwater – no updates
·
Street paving –
This year’s paving is complete. Chemcote still needs to correct a couple problems from last
year’s paving. Mr. Fogt
asked about the area in front of the Eagles.
Mr. Roush noted that is part of the ODOT program from last year. Mr. Tracey plans to work on that as time
permits.
·
Water and sewer
projects – Hope to have the bid documents together yet this month for the water
reservoir. Bid opening for the
reservoir will be early November. There
is a possibility it could be started yet this year.
·
Explore a
comprehensive impact fee – no updates
The meeting adjourned at 7:39
p.m.