JOINT
ADMINISTRATION/CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES
JULY 31,
2006
The meeting was called to
order by President Gore at 6:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Gore, Mr. Reams, Mr. Burke, Mr.
Fogt, Mr. Pleasant, Mr. Marshall, Ms. Sellers
OTHERS PRESENT: Mayor Kruse, Kathy House, John Morehart,
Tracie Davies, Gary Johnson, Floyd Golden, Eric Phillips, Brian Dostanko, Phil
Roush, Tim Aslaner, Connie Patterson
Sub-committees presented
their objectives as a result of their sub-committee
meetings.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SUB-COMMITTEE– Committee members:
Eric Phillips, John Morehart, David Burke, Ed
Pleasant, Tim Aslaner.
Objectives were presented
by Eric Phillips.
Objective #1 – Adopt
Marketing Strategy promoting the community.
Action Steps
1.
It was requested that the
committee finish the final development of the team Union County Marketing
Strategy. This has been
finalized. Economic Development
Director and Director of Administration are responsible for this.
2.
Adopt a Marketing Strategy
which would come before the Mayor and City
Council for approval.
3.
Implement the marketing
strategy. A consulting firm was
hired to develop a marketing strategy on how the City attracts business, how the
City attracts visitors and how we (City) promote ourselves within our
community.
4.
Encourage employers to have
employees reside in Marysville.
Mr. Phillips reported an
update since the committee met on June 7th. Christy Clark at the Chamber of Commerce
will start full time on August 1st. She will become the PR person for the
City of
Mr. Gore asked if the City
was going to share in her salary.
Ms. House stated not for the balance of this year.
Objective #2 – Retain our
current business and corporate base.
Action Steps
1.
Visit 23 companies in
2.
Work to streamline and
improve the development review process.
Currently there are issues regarding building inspection and how all that
works together. Also, the Design
Review process has just been updated. Currently working with the
Building Department to get an on-site plans examiner in Marysville versus
someone in
Objective #3 – Attract New
Businesses – focusing on the Diversification of the Business
Sector.
Action Steps:
1.
Identify using the Economic
Development Action Plan (EDAP) to the desirable uses, basically identifying
those uses we want to target.
2.
Use direct mailing, ads and
company contacts to be more pro-active in attracting business in the
community.
Objective #4 – Assist Local
Companies in Maintaining and Developing our
workforce.
Action Steps:
1.
Continue with Business
Education Workforce Team (BEWT).
This is a Chamber committee.
This will establish a better relationship between businesses, education
and the City. One of the issues is
having the lowest unemployment rate in the state of
2.
Pursue training and
educational opportunities.
Chamber is creating a
brochure on employer benefits of having their employees reside in the
community. Those will be
distributed to all HR Managers, CEO’s and Presidents in the community. The ultimate goal is to have more top
level managers and top executives live in the community. If they reside here, they will be more
engaged and more involved in Marysville.
Mayor Kruse stated that is
particularly important where the business isn’t inside the corporate
limits. For instance, Honda, the
only income tax the City derives off that is from people that live in the City
limits and work out there. We’re
not getting our full benefit.
Mr. Gore stated there are not a lot of Scotts
executives that live in this community.
Mr. Phillips noted that Honda pays more income tax to
Objective #5 – Revitalize
Uptown Marysville
Action Steps:
1.
Develop a resource guide of
all entities that provide business service and assistance. This goes hand in hand with the
retention program for Uptown Marysville.
2.
Work closely with URT to
accomplish its goals. The City
provided funds to URT which resulted in the most successful Honda Homecoming
ever. URT will continue to work
closely with the City.
3.
Develop Community
Development Block Grant Fund allocation each year to Uptown. Possibly a percentage of that money
would go to Uptown Marysville to help revitalize the City. The Town Run would be a great project.
4.
Adopt and implement Uptown
Improvement Plan. That plan is
scheduled to be completed in the next couple of months. Goal is to have it to Council for
adoption sometime in December.
Feels it’s critical for Council and the
Mr. Phillips shared the
Honda Homecoming successes. There
was more participation this year than ever before. There were more vendors this year. There were 891 motorcycles as counted by
a resident. Honda’s count was
860. Bellefontaine parade count was
300. Made more profit from beverage
sales than ever before with a gross profit of $7500. Vendor space was sold. Reagonomics was outstanding. Mayor Kruse said we need to do something
different with electric next year.
The generators are noisy and detract from the event.
LAND USE SUB-COMMITTEE
–
Committee members:
Mayor Kruse, John Marshall, Leah Sellers, Tracie Davies, Eric
Phillips.
Objectives were presented
by Eric Phillips.
Objective #1 – Review and
Consider the update of the Comprehensive
Plan
Mayor Kruse referred to
Page 3 and 4 of the Retreat Summary Report stating that the EDAP would be the
basis for this Land Use Plan. This
is the direction that was followed:
Action Steps:
1.
Hire a City Planner. This process has
begun.
2.
Review the 1999
Comprehensive Plan and potentially update it. After looking at it, committee felt it
was imperative to hire the city planner to allow him/her to review it and make
recommendations. Land Use and
Transportation were the two critical issues of all the components in the Plan
that needed to be reviewed.
Recommendations are to be made to Planning Commission and City
Council.
3.
Include
4.
Prioritize Comprehensive
Plan recommendations and review/update Comprehensive Plan every five (5)
years.
Ms. Davies commented that
the committee reviewed the Comprehensive Plan and was surprised at how many of
the recommendations had already been done.
Mr. Phillips is going to review the Comprehensive Plan recommendations
and list the status of everything.
Objective #2 – Improve
relationship among City Council, Planning Commission and Administrative
Staff
Action Steps:
1.
Appoint City Council member
to Planning Commission as an Ex-Officio member.
2.
Establish bi-monthly joint
Council-Planning Commission meetings.
3.
Consider requiring sketch
plan or preliminary plat review of large residential subdivisions by City
Council.
4.
Consider Charter amendment
that will assign four (4) Planning Commission appointments to the Mayor and
three (3) appointments to City Council.
Mr. Phillips stated most
cities divide the appointments.
Objective #3 – Consider the
Development of a Planning Accord for the
Action Steps:
1.
Continue involvement with
the 33 Corridor Group.
2.
Consider a Planning Accord
with US 33 Corridor jurisdictions
Mr. Gore commented that
he’s not opposed to the US 33 Corridor Group, but is not sure where we’re going
with it. He noted $1,500 was spent
to become a member of it. He
wonders whether we want to continue to do that, what we’re getting out of it and
where it’s headed, etc.
Mr. Reams stated the last
several months have been informational on the Accord, the process for the Accord
and trying to find out what everyone is expecting from it, and what each
jurisdiction wants to get out of it.
They met with the townships separately, the two cities that were involved
and the County as well. The end
result of that Accord would be a development plan for the Corridor that everyone
can live with.
Mr. Gore asked with the
Accord approach, if a township somewhere between the County line and the City of
Mr. Gore confirmed that an
Accord that’s not fully participated in by all entities, that in fact a township
could chose to do it their way, and the other members of the Accord could choose
not to provide the services that they bring to the table as a part of the
group. Mr. Reams stated that could
happen.
Mayor Kruse stated he’s
unsure where this is going at this point.
It could take up to two years before an Accord is finalized. They are still talking about what that
area may be that’s incorporated into this Accord. The County would like to see it much
broader, but just about everybody else is looking at a much more narrow scope to
this, including the townships. The
Mayor and
Mayor Kruse said that
Glacier West met with the City.
Attorney Dennis Schulze represented Glacier West. Mayor Kruse told him that the City
cannot make that work without an agreement with
Mr. Gore noted that he is
not inclined to throw another $1500 into that group next year unless we start
seeing some things happen and get some results out of it.
Mr. Reams commented that
when the meetings started a year and half or so ago, there was a lot of
distrust. People wondered what this
group wanted from us and what do they want to get from it; what’s behind the
scenes that they are working on trying to get. He feels the meetings over the last year
and a half have been a huge benefit in breaking down some barriers among the
various entities. There is a lot
more trust now than there was before.
Mayor Kruse feels the group
of people that are going to be talking to each other in this whole process in
trying to do an Accord will be a smaller group. He noted
Mayor Kruse met with
Kathryn Crowley from
FINANCE SUB-COMMITTEE - Committee
Members: David Burke, Dan Fogt, John Gore, John Morehart,
Kathy House
Mr. Burke presented the
objectives: Three areas of
interest: Income tax, Budget and
Fees
CITY INCOME
TAX:
1)
Is this what we want to do
when it comes to raising the income tax?
2)
If so, how
much?
3)
What to do with the
money?
Purpose: To strive to maintain the lowest
required tax burden possible to meet the needs of citizens in a form consistent
with our vision statement. To seek additional sources of revenue beyond income
tax.
Objective: Increase commercial growth for a better
tax base.
CITY
BUDGET:
1)
Any additional sources of
revenue?
2)
Cost
cutting?
3)
Correct debt
structure?
Purpose: To provide the most productive use of
tax dollars.
Objectives:
·
Fixed vs. variable
investments
·
Proper investing of
encumbered/unencumbered funds
·
Discuss investments/grant
assistant – A potential position within the City for somebody who would assist
the Finance Department with its
investment needs and nuances with
intergovernmental and governmental investing, as well as grant writing.
·
Identify areas for
donations and community involvement
FEES:
1)
Water and
Sewer
2)
Impact
fees
3)
Other
Purpose: To implement a fee structure that allows
for growth to pay for growth without additional cost burdens to current
residents.
Objectives:
·
Funds beyond income tax
such as additional closing cost on house.
It was noted that some school districts add on additional closing costs
to new homes, and those would be used to help fund
their school district. That may be
used for an impact fee for new homes.
That rolls into creative financial fees.
·
Property tax levies vs.
income tax
·
Divide levies/percentages
to individual needs so that higher users end up paying more than the lower
users
·
Impact fees for
street/fire/police etc.
Mr. Fogt stated that he is
supportive of impact fees.
Mr. Gore asked Mr. Morehart
how competitive the City was when it comes time to invest or do we deal strictly
with Fifth Third. Mr. Morehart
stated we have some investments with Fifth Third Bank, some with Fifth Third
Securities and some with Star Ohio.
Brian Carter and Brian Lee are brokers for the City. Mr. Gore asked if we go out to bid for
competitive rates. Mr. Morehart
said he doesn’t competitively bid the investments primarily because he feels
comfortable with the current services and strategy and he feels their rates are
competitive. He said he could
bid out and probably get a little bit more. Some cities have a third party that
works with the finance person that acts as a go between between the brokers that
he would deal with and the City.
They will tell you that they can shop and get more of a return, but they
will charge a fee to do that. He
has considered that option but decided to continue working with the
aforementioned individuals.
Mr. Morehart said we have quite a bit invested in our current investment
companies now. Probably within the
next two or three years, that investment number will be coming down because
we’re using those dollars and we’ll be spending those dollars for the wastewater
plant. There will be opportunities
for investment with the reservoir coming up. As we grow, we’ll have more ability to
invest, and there will be more reserves to invest as well. Mr. Gore noted that he has nothing but
the utmost confidence and trust in Mr. Morehart. That was not the point to his
question.
INFRASTRUCTURE
SUB-COMMITTEE -
Committee members:
Phil Roush, Gary Johnson, Floyd Golden, Mark Reams, Dan Fogt
Mr. Johnson referred to
Page 8 of the Retreat Summary.
Infrastructure got the most votes as far as having the highest
priorities. It also noted that
infrastructure issues by their very nature also require financial
commitment. Infrastructure issues
were sub-divided as follows:
Stormwater System, Neighborhood Design Standards assigned to Mark
Reams. Public Transportation such
as streets, bus system, sidewalks, bike trails, traffic patterns, etc. as well
as public safety facilities to include Fire, Police, Municipal Court, joint
mixed-use facilities assigned to Floyd Golden. Parks and cemetery issues assigned to
Dan Fogt. Buildings and grounds,
excluding water, wastewater, cemetery, parks and rec,
as well as Technology improvements assigned to Gary Johnson. Water treatment facility and reservoir
and wastewater system assigned to Phil Roush.
As
Chairman, Mr. Johnson asked all members to do a
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT:
Mr. Reams presented the
objectives.
Objective: Manage stormwater in a way that protects
lives and property.
Action Steps:
1.
Study stormwater flows to
identify requirements and actual situation. Phase 1 has already been done. Phase 2 should be finished in December
2006, Phase 3 in December 2007.
2.
Identify potential
solutions to problems and estimate costs, Phase 2 and 3, similar to what was done on first stormwater project, what
kind of projects needed and ballpark estimate on cost.
3.
Prioritize stormwater
projects, all three phases basically covering the City.
4.
Develop a 20-year plan to
fix those problems, including a financial plan. The idea of a 20-year plan was to try to
develop a plan that would fix the identified problems “within one
generation.”
Mr. Gore commented that
although it wasn’t to the degree that we wanted it to be, stormwater planning
was put in place. He has heard of
no flooding in the last couple years and we’ve had some pretty strong storms
recently. There has obviously been
some success in the plan already.
Ms. Davies said a lot of work has been done internally with staff. They just have not been able to do the
larger projects. Ms. Davies
stated ORW has made a big difference by doing a significant amount of work. That has helped a lot in the Barrhaven
area.
Mr. Brian Dostanko asked
about needed resources. City
currently has one stormwater operator.
He asked if there was a plan for an increase in stormwater staffing for
stormwater operators. Due to lack
of funding, one operator was postponed from 2007 to 2009. Ms. Davies stated stormwater is
supplementing with a Street Department man. It’s very difficult for one person to do
a job by themselves for stormwater.
NEIGHBORHOOD
DESIGN
Objective #1 Develop
neighborhood design standards that promote healthy family
living.
Objectives #1 and #2 are
based on the Vision for Marysville – The safe, friendly hometown where families
and economic opportunity grow together…
We are committed to community pride, healthy families, well-planned
neighborhoods and a vibrant economy.
Action Steps:
1.
Create neighborhood design
standards committee to study and recommend design standards (street lighting,
sidewalks, open space, neighborhood parks or recreation facilities, traffic
patterns, bike paths, lot dimensions, etc.)
2.
Review recommendations –
Planning Commission and Council would give input and review the recommendations
and then forward on to City Council for approval.
Objective #2
Action Steps:
1.
Update comprehensive plan
to show the street plans, the connected bike paths, open spaces, school sites
and recreation facilities. We have
pieces of this, but nothing in a global plan. They exist independent of each
other. We need to put it all
together.
TRANSPORTATION
Chief Golden stated all you
have to do is look downtown when you have the least little bit of disruption to
see a big traffic jam. Need to come
up with some type of plan. Should
follow the Thoroughfare Plan and update as needed.
Political
Issues:
·
Inefficient or inadequate
traffic flow can present the perception of a lack of planning by the
governmental unit (ourselves)
·
A tremendous need for
adequate parking, especially during special events such as Honda
Homecoming.
Economic
Issues:
·
As we continue to grow,
increased use of streets will require additional
maintenance.
·
Ways of funding is through
borrowing money versus tax increases (and not many people want tax
increases)
·
Possible State Funding
Issue 2 Money.
Social
Issues:
·
Traffic congestion causes
negative feelings among the drivers as well as the average citizen around
town.
·
Impact on business and
residential property owners if
FIRE
DIVISION
There is a current need in
the Fire Division for a new station at a location away from the uptown
congestion. It is difficult for the
fire trucks to leave the station and to get back in the station. Have looked at a site
at ORW for relocation of current station. Also looked at the
possibility of a second station.
Political
Issues:
·
Effects on existing Fire
and
·
Failure to adequately
provide Fire and
Economic
Issues:
Funding:
·
Continue with funding
through the general fund.
·
Income Tax
increase
·
Public Safety
levy
·
Impact/User
fees
Personnel:
·
Additional personnel would
be needed for a second station but not additional equipment. Equipment could be split between the two
stations.
Social
Issues:
In
talking with various people, some like having the fire station downtown. Some don’t see a need for another fire
station. There is a reluctance to
pay increased taxes whether it’s through an income tax increase or public safety
levy.
Technology
Issues:
·
In-vehicle computer
systems
·
Automatic vehicle locator
system
·
IT connectivity with rest
of city buildings
POLICE
FACILITIES
Police Division is
presently located in a building that is not suitable for its needs. Chief Golden feels strongly about
this. They have about 2400 sq. ft.
for the entire police force. In the
last 30 years, the Police Division has only gained 700 sq. ft. There are 29 people in the Police
Division which share this space and always have less than 100 sq. ft. in which
to operate within a day.
There has been discussion
about relocating to the current fire station if and when it’s vacated. This would require renovation of the old
Fire Station. There has also been
discussion of building a new facility.
If such a building is constructed, it should be part of a justice center
or in close proximity of Municipal Court.
As annexation takes place, and/or a second fire station is constructed,
consideration should be given to locating a sub-station in the second fire
station.
Political
Issues:
·
New facility vs. renovation
of vacated uptown fire station.
·
Would municipal court agree
to share a building with the police division?
·
Should it be a municipal
complex including the majority of city offices?
Economic
Issues:
·
Borrow money for
construction?
·
Increase city income
tax
·
Public safety construction
levy
Social
Issues:
Internal:
·
Reluctance of police
personnel to move into another old building that is not designed to be a police
station. This has always been the
case. Some feel the police just
receive hand-me downs.
·
Employee morale can be
adversely affected by working in a building that is not designed for efficient
operations.
Chief Golden added they can
still do their work efficiently, but it’s just not a very nice place,
particularly when it comes to people touring the facility.
Mr. Dostanko added if a new
justice center were to be built, there would be IT connectivity issues
again.
Chief Golden commented that
building security is a real problem in this building. There is not much building
security.
Mr. Dostanko stated a
security assessment was done in September of last year. Every facility was reviewed from a
security perspective, and this building has a lot of issues when using the
standard state checklist. This was
identified as a very high priority.
The metal detector has
never been connected. If connected,
it would have to be staffed.
External:
·
Most citizens do not
realize the conditions the police personnel work under in the current
building.
Mr. Gore stated about three
years ago that he felt it was a sad statement that a community this size calls
that a police station. With
everything that has been reported so far, with all due respect to the Fire
Department, the Police Department needs to be at the top of the list as far as
trying to do something to upgrade those facilities.
Mayor Kruse expressed
concern that we’re living on borrowed time with respect to social issues. He feels at some point the economy is
going to tank around here, particularly at Honda, possibly at Scotts. The issues that we’re going to have in
terms of law enforcement and some of the other associated issues are going to be
horrendous, and we’re no way shape or form doing anything to think about these
issues and how we’re going to deal with them, the domestic violence, the
burglaries, etc. It will be massive
as the town grows.
Mr. Aslaner stated he feels
security in this building should be a top priority. He’s been in a lot of court houses and
can’t remember walking into a court house or court room with a lot of people
with a wide array of crimes being handled and not having any security
whatsoever. Mayor Kruse
stated it’s not only our problem.
He’s heard nothing out of the court as far as security in this
building. He feels the court should
take the lead role in the security issue.
CEMETERY AND PARKS &
REC
Mr. Fogt discussed the
proposed cemetery improvements as follows:
·
Building addition $50,000
·
Expansion to Oakdale $175,000
o
Engineering
o
Tiling
o
Utilities, plots, water
lines
o
Streets
o
Landscaping
o
Automatic
gates
·
Mausoleum $300,000 to
$750,000
·
Bridge repair $25,000 to $50,000
Mr. Gore suggested selling
the cemetery. It was the consensus
of group that it would not be easy to sell. There is not much room for
expansion. City should not consider
expanding it in the future. Mayor
Kruse suggested talking to the funeral directors about the idea of selling the
cemetery.
Mr. Fogt presented the 5-year improvement plan for Parks &
Recreation.
BUILDINGS AND
GROUNDS
City administration, court,
police building. Chief Johnson
reported that the current needs are critical.
Municipal Court needs a lot
more room. Police Dept. is
scattered throughout the building and space is very limited/cramped.
Storage space at City Hall (and all fixed facilities) is very
limited. Municipal court has
serious security issues as well as pressing needs that have (state/federal)
mandates outside of our control.
Feeling is that the Police Department and Municipal Court should be
located in a
The
Technology – A movement
towards fiber optic connectivity between city facilities is currently under
way. Wi-Fi interconnectivity for
the downtown area is currently being explored through the Chamber. Chief Johnson said we should coordinate
those efforts to possibly expand on that and maximize economies of scale.
Currently the City’s
in-house finance system software and human resource software are
incompatible. The data mining
capabilities between the two systems are extremely limited. Mr. Dostanko cited one example. Sick-leave usage by Fire Division cannot
be retrieved from a query; must look at payroll records manually. HR does use the payroll system, but HR
has developed their own database using Access.
The current in-house phone
system contract expires in 2007 and options will be explored at that
time.
Current efforts should
focus on “immediate connectivity” between different structures in the City. The Code Red system should be pursued in
concert with the county. This
system can make 2500/3000 calls a minute.
Chief Johnson stated Homeland Security Funding has been identified for
this project.
A
group of individuals is working with other County public safety services, i.e.
EMA and the Sheriff’s office, on a low-cost, very effective system to integrate
the GIS technology, Pictometry and Automatic Vehicle Location devices in all
public safety vehicles.
Mayor Kruse asked about
Homeland Security money for the security issues at City Hall. Chief Johnson said there is money; you
just have to go after it.
Mr. Fogt asked about the Public Service Center building and the
construction issues with it. Chief
Johnson stated there is diesel exhaust that filters through the walls into the
offices. There is a mezzanine used
for storage, and because of the design of it, the load limit is 100 pounds per
square foot. There is no
insulation. Mr. Gore noted there
was a report generated about three years or so ago identifying those
problems. Clerk Patterson will look
for that report. Chief Johnson
noted there was a design for that building, but they kept cutting and cutting,
so cheaper is not always better because sooner or later you end up paying for
it. Mr. Gore said the City ended up
doing most of the work themselves instead of contracting it out. Chief Johnson stated he just received a
Homeland Security Grant for exhaust removal for the old bay side of the Fire
Station. The primary reason they
got that money is because diesel fumes are loaded with carcinogens. There is no vehicle exhaust extraction
system in the Public Service Center. Mr. Dostanko also stated
there is lack of storage for archiving.
Storage in the mezzanine is very limited.
Mr. Marshall asked how much
money in the last two to three years has been put into the City Hall
building. Ms. Davies estimated
about $250,000 within the last five years.
WASTEWATER AND WATER
SYSTEM
Mr. Roush reported that in
the wastewater priority area there were three objectives:
1)
Keep adequate capacity to
accommodate growth, particularly in regards to the size of the Wastewater
Plant
2)
Keep infiltration and flow
out of the collection system.
Annual programs for that are in the budget.
3)
To build trunk sewers in
the growth area to accommodate the growth that will happen, whether that is
financed by the system as envisioned in the Wastewater Master Plan and/or by
development-driven projects.
Water System
priorities:
1)
Have adequate capacity to
accommodate growth
2)
Maintain adequate raw water
resources, the reservoir phase.
City expects to enter into a contract either late this year or early next
year.
3)
To provide adequate
pressure and flow at all points in the distribution system. The Master Plan calls for a two-tiered
system because of a pressure area in the west side of town which has a lower
pressure than the east side of town.
Mr. Fogt asked if the City has the raw water capacity. Ms. Davies stated we do. Right now they are using quite a bit of
well water, which is more costly; it takes a lot more to treat the well
water. With the reservoir we’ll be
able to get away from using as much well water. The City is in the process of re-rating
at the Water Plant so that EPA will agree with the City that we can actually
produce more water than the 3.18 that they are giving us credit for. Want to get it upgraded to 4.33
mgd.
COMMUNICATION
SUB-COMMITTEE: Committee
members: John Gore, John Marshall,
Brian Dostanko, Kathy House
Objective
#1. Identify all current City communication
processes or capabilities.
Action item:
·
Create a matrix detailing
major communications capabilities regarding the “four Cs” (City Administration,
Citizens, Council and City employees)
Objective #2. Examine current City organizational infrastructure for possible improvements to City’s capabilities regarding communications. He noted on Pg. 12 of the Retreat Summary Report about developing a constructive media strategy.